Also, creative consequences work best for older children who already trained and no discipline is one-size fits all. I mostly agree with you, but the hard thing about the way you’ve put it is that it’s not abundantly clear that you mean time-outs as the disciplinary action is not effective. So I take away that privilege for a period of time. Like I mentioned above, if my child leaves his bike out, he clearly hasn’t proven that he is responsible enough to ride it. Then, come up with something that “fits the crime,” so to speak. Rather than just spewing out wrath and penalty for inappropriate behavior, take a few minutes to cool down (you can read more about that here). I want them to learn the lesson, and I bet you do too! Logical consequences are the answer to this. I have no desire to tell them the same things over and over again. If putting kids in a time out chair isn’t teaching them anything, I need a better solution. Logical consequences are far more effective. And, of course, it leaves them ill-equipped for handling problems when we aren’t right there to remove them from the situation. That encourages the very behavior we are trying to stop. When we respond by giving them a time out, we are actually making them happy.
Little boys time out chair how to#
They need to be removed from it and don’t know how to do that themselves, so they act out. MANY children actually enjoy a little time away from the situation. I find that putting kids in time out costs them very little, maybe a little time away at most. Haha!) But the consequences we do give should be “painful” in the sense that the child actually wants to avoid the consequence.
(I’m trusting that you are not pushing your kids down on the sidewalk. That means it happens as a natural result of a poor choice.Īs parents, we don’t give natural consequences to our children.
Little boys time out chair skin#
Some consequences are actually physically painful, like when you keep running on the sidewalk anyway and skin your knee. It is “painful” because they will lose something, like the privilege of riding his bike because he won’t put it away where it belongs. In most cases, I want a consequence for my children that will cost them something. When I say “painful,” I don’t mean physically. Putting kids in time out is neither painful nor memorable. Why I gave up putting kids in time out 1. Time out does little for the heart condition. So, based on that lesson, does putting kids in time out have an effective discipline result? I’d argue that it doesn’t. What keeps you from touching the stove? It’s mostly the fear of that painful and memorable consequence: getting burned. You’ve probably burned yourself on something at some point in your life. I bring up this story to illustrate my point: We don’t usually stop a behavior unless the consequences we face are logical, painful, and memorable. Now, I’m not advocating that we all get a giant bottle of soap and start dousing disobedient children. I never bit anyone again, mostly because I didn’t EVER again want to experience the same pain and taste the soap left lingering. She decided that if I was going to use my mouth to hurt someone, she would do something to keep my mouth from enjoying that activity. My teacher put soap on my tongue and stood me in the corner for an old-fashioned kids time out. I remember the sting on my tongue and the bitter taste. I actually don’t even remember why I bit the girl.
OK, the truth is I don’t really remember how I felt. I mean, what would any self-respecting 4-year-old do? I had to defend my right to have that toy! Right? She took my toy and I didn’t like it, so I bit her. Wondering if kids time out really works? Here’s why I gave up time out and what I do instead-3 tips that will help when it’s time to discipline.
0 kommentar(er)
